– ICAT DESIGN AND PROJECT ADVISORY · TSG LABS · ONTARIO, CANADA

Start a conversationWhat this covers ↓

The integration problem

On integrated facility projects, each discipline's engineer produces work that is technically correct within their scope. The problems live at the boundaries. Access control and video systems not designed to share events. Building automation that does not coordinate with the security system on alarms. Networks that were designed without accounting for the building automation and physical security traffic that would run on them. These failures are predictable, and most can be identified and resolved during design if someone is looking for them.

Hans Study, CISSP, has worked on ICAT and integrated security projects at major airports, border crossing facilities, transit infrastructure, government buildings, and large enterprise campuses across Canada. The advisory covers integrated system design, owner's representative services, design and specification review, and independent oversight through commissioning and acceptance.

On projects with multiple contractors, someone needs to hold the integration together. TSG Labs provides that function as an independent technical voice that works for the owner, not the design team and not the contractors.

When to bring in independent advisory

During pre-design or early design is ideal. Technology master planning at the earliest project stage sets the integration architecture before the individual discipline designers begin their work. If the design is already underway, an independent design review can still identify integration gaps before they go to tender. Once in construction, owner's representative services catch installation and commissioning problems before they become acceptance disputes.

Start a conversation

Systems covered

• CCTV and Access Control
• Enterprise Network Architecture
• Data Centre and Structured Cabling
• Physical Security Design and Assessment

Owner's Representative Services

An independent technical advocate for the owner across multiple contractors. Reviews submittals and shop drawings, manages RFIs on behalf of the owner, conducts site observations at key milestones, and provides a documented record of what was reviewed and accepted. Matters most when the owner's staff do not have the technical depth to evaluate what the contractors are delivering.

Technology Master Planning

Defines the scope of ICAT systems, establishes the integration architecture, and identifies the major technology decisions that need to be made before detailed design begins. Reduces expensive surprises during design and construction and gives the owner a framework to evaluate the design team's work against.

Commissioning Advisory and Acceptance

Systems that pass their individual acceptance tests but do not work correctly when integrated are a predictable commissioning failure. Independent technical review verifies that the integrated systems function as designed, not just that each subsystem passes its own acceptance criteria. Final acceptance based on independent verification rather than integrator self-certification.

When should I bring in independent ICAT advisory?

During pre-design or early design is ideal. Technology master planning at the earliest project stage sets the architecture before the individual discipline designers begin their work. If the design is already underway, an independent design review can still identify integration gaps before they go to tender. Once in construction, owner's representative services catch installation and commissioning problems before they become acceptance disputes.

Does TSG Labs provide ICAT advisory for airports and transit facilities?

Yes. Hans Study, CISSP, has worked on ICAT and integrated security projects at major airports, border crossing facilities, and transit infrastructure across Canada. These environments have specific requirements for system redundancy, regulatory compliance, and integration between secured and unsecured zones. The advisory experience in these environments is direct.

What is the difference between an ICAT designer and an owner's representative?

An ICAT designer produces the design and specifications the contractors build to. An owner's representative oversees the project on behalf of the owner, verifying that what is being built matches the design. TSG Labs can provide both. On projects where a designer is already engaged, independent owner's representative services from TSG Labs provide a technical check not subject to the designer's interest in defending their own work.

Start a conversation